Lista completa de Organizaciones Estadounidenses financiadas por George Soros

Advancement Project: This organization works to organize “communities of color” into politically cohesive units while disseminating its leftist worldviews and values as broadly as possible by way of a sophisticated communications department.

Air America Radio: Now defunct, this was a self-identified “liberal” radio network.

Al-Haq: This NGO produces highly politicized reports, papers, books, and legal analyses regarding alleged Israeli human-rights abuses committed against Palestinians.

All of Us or None: This organization seeks to change voting laws — which vary from state to state — so as to allow ex-inmates, parolees, and even current inmates to cast their ballots in political elections.

Alliance for Justice: Best known for its activism vis a vis the appointment of federal judges, this group consistently depicts Republican judicial nominees as “extremists.”

America Coming Together: Soros played a major role in creating this group, whose purpose was to coordinate and organize pro-Democrat voter-mobilization programs.

America Votes: Soros also played a major role in creating this group, whose get-out-the-vote campaigns targeted likely Democratic voters.

America’s Voice: This open-borders group seeks to promote “comprehensive” immigration reform that includes a robust agenda in favor of amnesty for illegal aliens.

American Bar Association Commission on Immigration Policy: This organization “opposes laws that require employers and persons providing education, health care, or other social services to verify citizenship or immigration status.”

American Bridge 21st Century: This Super PAC conducts opposition research designed to help Democratic political candidates defeat their Republican foes.

American Civil Liberties Union: This group opposes virtually all post-9/11 national security measures enacted by the U.S. government. It supports open borders, has rushed to the defense of suspected terrorists and their abettors, and appointed former New Left terrorist Bernardine Dohrn to its Advisory Board.

American Constitution Society for Law and Policy: This Washington, DC-based think tank seeks to move American jurisprudence to the left by recruiting, indoctrinating, and mobilizing young law students, helping them acquire positions of power. It also provides leftist Democrats with a bully pulpit from which to denounce their political adversaries.

American Family Voices: This group creates and coordinates media campaigns charging Republicans with wrongdoing.

American Federation of Teachers: After longtime AFT President Albert Shanker died in in 1997, he was succeeded by Sandra Feldman, who slowly “re-branded” the union, allying it with some of the most powerful left-wing elements of the New Labor Movement. When Feldman died in 2004, Edward McElroy took her place, followed by Randi Weingarten in 2008. All of them kept the union on the leftward course it had adopted in its post-Shanker period.

American Friends Service Committee: This group views the United States as the principal cause of human suffering around the world. As such, it favors America’s unilateral disarmament, the dissolution of American borders, amnesty for illegal aliens, the abolition of the death penalty, and the repeal of the Patriot Act.

American Immigration Council: This non-profit organization is a prominent member of the open-borders lobby. It advocates expanded rights and amnesty for illegal aliens residing in the U.S.

American Immigration Law Foundation: This group supports amnesty for illegal aliens, on whose behalf it litigates against the U.S. government.

American Independent News Network: This organization promotes “impact journalism” that advocates progressive change.

American Institute for Social Justice: AISJ’s goal is to produce skilled community organizers who can “transform poor communities” by agitating for increased government spending on city services, drug interdiction, crime prevention, housing, public-sector jobs, access to healthcare, and public schools.

American Library Association: This group has been an outspoken critic of the Bush administration’s War on Terror — most particularly, Section 215 of the USA Patriot Act, which it calls “a present danger to the constitutional rights and privacy rights of library users.”

The American Prospect, Inc.: This corporation trains and mentors young leftwing journalists, and organizes strategy meetings for leftist leaders.

Amnesty International: This organization directs a grossly disproportionate share of its criticism for human rights violations at the United States and Israel.

Applied Research Center: Viewing the United States as a nation where “structural racism” is deeply “embedded in the fabric of society,” ARC seeks to “build a fair and equal society” by demanding “concrete change from our most powerful institutions.”

Arab American Institute Foundation: The Arab American Institute denounces the purportedly widespread civil liberties violations directed against Arab Americans in the post-9/11 period, and characterizes Israel as a brutal oppressor of the Palestinian people.

Aspen Institute: This organization promotes radical environmentalism and views America as a nation plagued by deep-seated “structural racism.”

Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now: This group conducts voter mobilization drives on behalf of leftist Democrats. These initiatives have been notoriously marred by fraud and corruption.

Ballot Initiative Strategy Center: This organization seeks to advance “a national progressive strategy” by means of ballot measures—state-level legislative proposals that pass successfully through a petition (“initiative”) process and are then voted upon by the public.

Bend The Arc: A Jewish Partnership for Justice: This organization condemns Voter ID laws as barriers that “make it harder for communities of color, women, first-time voters, the elderly, and the poor to cast their vote.”

Bill of Rights Defense Committee: This group provides a detailed blueprint for activists interested in getting their local towns, cities, and even college campuses to publicly declare their opposition to the Patriot Act, and to designate themselves “Civil Liberties Safe Zones.” The organization also came to the defense of self-described radical attorney Lynne Stewart, who was convicted in 2005 of providing material support for terrorism.

Black Alliance for Just Immigration: This organization seeks to create a unified movement for “social and economic justice” centered on black racial identity.

Blueprint North Carolina: This group seeks to “influence state policy in North Carolina so that residents of the state benefit from more progressive policies such as better access to health care, higher wages, more affordable housing, a safer, cleaner environment, and access to reproductive health services.”

Brennan Center for Justice: This think tank/legal activist group generates scholarly studies, mounts media campaigns, files amicus briefs, gives pro bono support to activists, and litigates test cases in pursuit of radical “change.”

Brookings Institution: This organization has been involved with a variety of internationalist and state-sponsored programs, including one that aspires to facilitate the establishment of a U.N.-dominated world government. Brookings Fellows have also called for additional global collaboration on trade and banking; the expansion of the Kyoto Protocol; and nationalized health insurance for children. Nine Brookings economists signed a petitionopposing President Bush’s tax cuts in 2003.

Campaign for America’s Future: This group supports tax hikes, socialized medicine, and a dramatic expansion of social welfare programs.

Campaign for Better Health Care: This organization favors a single-payer, government-run, universal health care system.

Campaign for Youth Justice: This organization contends that “transferring juveniles to the adult criminal-justice system leads to higher rates of recidivism, puts incarcerated and detained youth at unnecessary risk, has little deterrence value, and does not increase public safety.”

Campus Progress: A project of the Soros-bankrolled Center for American Progress, this group seeks to “strengthen progressive voices on college and university campuses, counter the growing influence of right-wing groups on campus, and empower new generations of progressive leaders.”

Casa de Maryland: This organization aggressively lobbies legislators to vote in favor of policies that promote expanded rights, including amnesty, for illegal aliens currently residing in the United States.

Catalist: This is a for-profit political consultancy that seeks “to help progressive organizations realize measurable increases in civic participation and electoral success by building and operating a robust national voter database of every voting-age American.”

Catholics for Choice: This nominally Catholic organization supports women’s right to abortion-on-demand.

Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good: This political nonprofit group is dedicated to generating support from the Catholic community for leftwing candidates, causes, and legislation.

Center for American Progress: This leftist think tank is headed by former Clinton chief of staff John Podesta, works closely with Hillary Clinton, and employs numerous former Clinton administration staffers. It is committed to “developing a long-term vision of a progressive America” and “providing a forum to generate new progressive ideas and policy proposals.”

Center for Community Change: This group recruits and trains activists to spearhead leftist “political issue campaigns.” Promoting increased funding for social welfare programs by bringing “attention to major national issues related to poverty,” the Center bases its training programs on the techniques taught by the famed radical organizer Saul Alinsky.

Center for Constitutional Rights: This pro-Castro organization is a core member of the open borders lobby, has opposed virtually all post-9/11 anti-terrorism measures by the U.S. government, and alleges that American injustice provokes acts of international terrorism.

Center for Economic and Policy Research: This group opposed welfare reform, supports “living wage” laws, rejects tax cuts, and consistently lauds the professed achievements of socialist regimes, most notably Venezuela.

Center for International Policy: This organization uses advocacy, policy research, media outreach, and educational initiatives to promote “transparency and accountability” in U.S. foreign policy and global relations. It generally views America as a disruptive, negative force in the world.

Center for Reproductive Rights: CRR’s mission is to guarantee safe, affordable contraception and abortion-on-demand for all women, including adolescents. The organization has filed state and federal lawsuits demanding access to taxpayer-funded abortions (through Medicaid) for low-income women.

Center for Responsible Lending: This organization was a major player in the subprime mortgage crisis. According to Phil Kerpen (vice president for policy at Americans for Prosperity), CRL “sh[ook] down and harass[ed] banks into making bad loans to unqualified borrowers.” Moreover, CRL negotiated a contract enabling it to operate as a conduit of high-risk loans to Fannie Mae.

Center for Social Inclusion: This organization seeks to counteract America’s “structural racism” by means of taxpayer-funded policy initiatives.

Center on Budget and Policy Priorities: Reasoning from the premise that tax cuts generally help only the wealthy, this organization advocates greater tax expenditures on social welfare programs for low earners.

Center on Wisconsin Strategy (COWS): Aiming to redistribute wealth by way of higher taxes imposed on those whose incomes are above average, COWS contends that “it is important that state government be able to harness fair contribution from all parts of society – including corporations and the wealthy.”

Change America Now: Formed in December 2006, Change America Now describes itself as “an independent political organization created to educate citizens on the failed policies of the Republican Congress and to contrast that record of failure with the promise offered by a Democratic agenda.”

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington: This group litigates and brings ethics charges against “government officials who sacrifice the common good to special interests” and “betray the public trust.” Almost all of its targets are Republicans.

Coalition for an International Criminal Court: This group seeks to subordinate American criminal-justice procedures to those of an international court.

Color Of Change: This organization was founded to combat what it viewed as the systemic racism pervading America generally and conservatism in particular.

Common Cause: This organization aims to bring about campaign-finance reform, pursue media reform resembling the Fairness Doctrine, and cut military budgets in favor of increased social-welfare and environmental spending.

Constitution Project: This organization seeks to challenge the legality of military commissions; end the detainment of “enemy combatants”; condemn government surveillance of terrorists; and limit the President’s executive privileges.

Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund: Defenders of Wildlife opposes oil exploration in Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. It condemns logging, ranching, mining, and even the use of recreational motorized vehicles as activities that are destructive to the environment.

Democracy Alliance: This self-described “liberal organization” aims to raise $200 million to develop a funding clearinghouse for leftist groups. Soros is a major donor to this group.

Democracy 21: This group is a staunch supporter of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, also known as the McCain-Feingold Act.

Democracy Now!: Democracy Now! was created in 1996 by WBAI radio news director Amy Goodman and four partners to provide “perspectives rarely heard in the U.S. corporate-sponsored media,” i.e., the views of radical and foreign journalists, left and labor activists, and ideological foes of capitalism.

Democratic Justice Fund: DJF opposes the Patriot Act and most efforts to restrict or regulate immigration into the United States — particularly from countries designated by the State Department as “terrorist nations.”

Democratic Party: Soros’ funding activities are devoted largely to helping the Democratic Party solidify its power base. In a November 2003 interview, Soros stated that defeating President Bush in 2004 “is the central focus of my life” … “a matter of life and death.” He pledged to raise $75 million to defeat Bush, and personally donated nearly a third of that amount to anti-Bush organizations. “America under Bush,” he said, “is a danger to the world, and I’m willing to put my money where my mouth is.”

Demos: This organization lobbies federal and state policymakers to “addres[s] the economic insecurity and inequality that characterize American society today”; promotes “ideas for reducing gaps in wealth, income and political influence”; and favors tax hikes for the wealthy.

Drum Major Institute: This group describes itself as “a non-partisan, non-profit think tank generating the ideas that fuel the progressive movement,” with the ultimate aim of persuading “policymakers and opinion-leaders” to take steps that advance its vision of “social and economic justice.”

Earthjustice: This group seeks to place severe restrictions on how U.S. land and waterways may be used. It opposes most mining and logging initiatives, commercial fishing businesses, and the use of motorized vehicles in undeveloped areas.

Economic Policy Institute: This organization believes that “government must play an active role in protecting the economically vulnerable, ensuring equal opportunity, and improving the well-being of all Americans.”

Electronic Privacy Information Center: This organization has been a harsh critic of the USA PATRIOT Act and has joined the American Civil Liberties Union in litigating two cases calling for the FBI “to publicly release or account for thousands of pages of information about the government’s use of PATRIOT Act powers.”

Ella Baker Center for Human Rights: Co-founded by the revolutionary communist Van Jones, this anti-poverty organization claims that “decades of disinvestment in our cities” — compounded by “excessive, racist policing and over-incarceration” — have “led to despair and homelessness.”

EMILY’s List: This political network raises money for Democratic female political candidates who support unrestricted access to taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand.

Energy Action Coalition: Founded in 2004, this group describes itself as “a coalition of 50 youth-led environmental and social justice groups working together to build the youth clean energy and climate movement.” For EAC, this means “dismantling oppression” according to its principles of environmental justice.

Equal Justice USA: This group claims that America’s criminal-justice system is plagued by “significant race and class biases,” and thus seeks to promote major reforms.

Fair Immigration Reform Movement: This is the open-borders arm of the Center for Community Change.

Faithful America: This organization promotes the redistribution of wealth, an end to enhanced interrogation procedures vis a vis prisoners-of-war, the enactment of policies to combat global warming, and the creation of a government-run heath care system.

Families USA: This Washington-based health-care advocacy group favors ever-increasing government control of the American healthcare system.

Feminist Majority: Characterizing the United States as an inherently sexist nation, this group focuses on “advancing the legal, social and political equality of women with men, countering the backlash to women’s advancement, and recruiting and training young feminists to encourage future leadership for the feminist movement in the United States.”

Four Freedoms Fund: This organization was designed to serve as a conduit through which large foundations could fund state-based open-borders organizations more flexibly and quickly.

Free Exchange on Campus: This organization was created solely to oppose the efforts of one individual, David Horowitz, and his campaign to have universities adopt an “Academic Bill of Rights,” as well as todenounce Horowitz’s 2006 book The Professors. Member organizations of FEC include Campus Progress (a project of the Center for American Progress); the American Association of University Professors; theAmerican Civil Liberties Union; People For the American Way; the United States Student Association; theCenter for Campus Free Speech; the American Library Association; Free Press; and the National Association of State Public Interest Research Groups.

Free Press: This “media reform” organization has worked closely with many notable leftists and such organizations as Media Matters for America, Air America Radio, Global Exchange, Code Pink, Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, the Revolutionary Communist Party, Mother Jones magazine, and Pacifica Radio.

Funding Exchange: Dedicated to the concept of philanthropy as a vehicle for social change, this organization pairs leftist donors and foundations with likeminded groups and activists who are dedicated to bringing about their own version of “progressive” change and social justice. Many of these grantees assume that American society is rife with racism, discrimination, exploitation, and inequity and needs to be overhauled via sustained education, activism, and social agitation.

Gamaliel Foundation: Modeling its tactics on those of the radical Sixties activist Saul Alinsky, this group takes a strong stand against current homeland security measures and immigration restrictions.

Gisha: Center for the Legal Protection of Freedom of Movement: This anti-Israel organization seeks to help Palestinians “exercise their right to freedom of movement.”

Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect: This group contends that when a state proves either unable or unwilling to protect civilians from mass atrocities occurring within its borders, it is the responsibility of the international community to intervene — peacefully if possible, but with military force if necessary.

Global Exchange: Established in 1988 by pro-Castro radical Medea Benjamin, this group consistently condemns America’s foreign policy, business practices, and domestic life. Following the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Global Exchange advised Americans to examine “the root causes of resentment against the United States in the Arab world — from our dependence on Middle Eastern oil to our biased policy towards Israel.”

Grantmakers Without Borders: GWB tends to be very supportive of leftist environmental, anti-war, and civil rights groups. It is also generally hostile to capitalism, which it deems one of the chief “political, economic, and social systems” that give rise to a host of “social ills.”

Green For All: This group was created by Van Jones to lobby for federal climate, energy, and economic policy initiatives.

Health Care for America Now: This group supports a “single payer” model where the federal government would be in charge of financing and administering the entire U.S. healthcare system.

Human Rights Campaign: The largest “lesbian-gay-bisexual-transgender” lobbying group in the United States, HRC supports political candidates and legislation that will advance the LGBT agenda. Historically, HRC has most vigorously championed HIV/AIDS-related legislation, “hate crime” laws, the abrogation of the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy, and the legalization of gay marriage.

Human Rights First: This group supports open borders and the rights of illegal aliens; charges that the Patriot Act severely erodes Americans’ civil liberties; has filed amicus curiae briefs on behalf of terror suspect Jose Padilla; and deplores the Guantanamo Bay detention facilities.

Human Rights Watch: This group directs a disproportionate share of its criticism at the United States and Israel. It opposes the death penalty in all cases, and supports open borders and amnesty for illegal aliens.

I’lam: This anti-Israel NGO seeks “to develop and empower the Arab media and to give voice to Palestinian issues.”

Immigrant Defense Project: To advance the cause of illegal immigrants, the IDP provides immigration law backup support and counseling to New York defense attorneys and others who represent or assist immigrants in criminal justice and immigration systems, as well as to immigrants themselves.

Immigrant Legal Resource Center: This group claims to have helped gain amnesty for some three million illegal aliens in the U.S., and in the 1980s was part of the sanctuary movement which sought to grant asylum to refugees from the failed Communist states of Central America.

Immigrant Workers Citizenship Project: This open-borders organization advocates mass immigration to the U.S.

Immigration Advocates Network: This alliance of immigrant-rights groups seeks to “increase access to justice for low-income immigrants and strengthen the capacity of organizations serving them.”

Immigration Policy Center: IPC is an advocate of open borders and contends that the massive influx of illegal immigrants into America is due to U.S. government policy, since “the broken immigration system […] spurs unauthorized immigration in the first place.”

Independent Media Center: This Internet-based, news and events bulletin board represents an invariably leftist, anti-capitalist perspective and serves as a mouthpiece for anti-globalization/anti-America themes.

Independent Media Institute: IMI administers the SPIN Project (Strategic Press Information Network), which provides leftist organizations with “accessible and affordable strategic communications consulting, training, coaching, networking opportunities and concrete tools” to help them “achieve their social justice goals.”

Institute for America’s Future: IAF supports socialized medicine, increased government funding for education, and the creation of an infrastructure “to ensure that the voice of the progressive majority is heard.”

Institute for New Economic Thinking: Seeking to create a new worldwide “economic paradigm,” this organization is staffed by numerous individuals who favor government intervention in national economies, and who view capitalism as a flawed system.

Institute for Policy Studies: This think tank has long supported Communist and anti-American causes around the world. Viewing capitalism as a breeding ground for “unrestrained greed,” IPS seeks to provide a corrective to “unrestrained markets and individualism.” Professing an unquestioning faith in the righteousness of the United Nations, it aims to bring American foreign policy under UN control.

Institute for Public Accuracy: This anti-American, anti-capitalist organization sponsored actor Sean Penn’s celebrated visit to Baghdad in 2002. It also sponsored visits to Iraq by Democratic Congressmen Nick Rahall and former Democrat Senator James Abourezk

Institute for Women’s Policy Research: This group views the U.S. as a nation rife with discrimination against women, and publishes research to draw attention to this alleged state of affairs. It also advocates unrestricted access to taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand, stating that “access to abortion is essential to the economic well-being of women and girls.”

International Crisis Group: One of this organization’s leading figures is its Mideast Director, Robert Malley, who was President Bill Clinton’s Special Assistant for Arab-Israeli Affairs. His analysis of the Mideast conflict is markedly pro-Palestinian.

J Street: This anti-Israel group warns that Israel’s choice to take military action to stop Hamas’ terrorist attacks “will prove counter-productive and only deepen the cycle of violence in the region”

Jewish Funds for Justice: This organization views government intervention and taxpayer funding as crucial components of enlightened social policy. It seeks to redistribute wealth from Jewish donors to low-income communities “to combat the root causes of domestic economic and social injustice.” By JFJ’s reckoning, chief among those root causes are the inherently negative by-products of capitalism – most notably racism and “gross economic inequality.”

Joint Victory Campaign 2004: Founded by George Soros and Harold Ickes, this group was a major fundraising entity for Democrats during the 2004 election cycle. It collected contributions (including large amounts from Soros personally) and disbursed them to two other groups, America Coming Together and the Media Fund, which also worked on behalf of Democrats.

Justice at Stake: This coalition calls for judges to be appointed by nonpartisan, independent commissions in a process known as “merit selection,” rather than elected by the voting public.

LatinoJustice PRLDF: This organization supports bilingual education, the racial gerrymandering of voting districts, and expanded rights for illegal aliens.

Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law: This group views America as an unremittingly racist nation; uses the courts to mandate race-based affirmative action preferences in business and academia; has filed briefs against the Department of Homeland Security’s efforts to limit the wholesale granting of green cards and to identify potential terrorists; condemns the Patriot Act; and calls on Americans to “recognize the contribution” of illegal aliens.

Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights: This organization views the United States as a nation rife with racism, sexism, and all manner of social injustice; and it uses legislative advocacy to push for “progressive change” that will create “a more open and just society.”

League of United Latin American Citizens: This group views America as a nation plagued by “an alarming increase in xenophobia and anti-Hispanic sentiment”; favors racial preferences; supports the legalization of illegal Hispanic aliens; opposes military surveillance of U.S. borders; opposes making English America’s official language; favors open borders; and rejects anti-terrorism legislation like the Patriot Act.

League of Women Voters Education Fund: The League supports taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand; supports “motor-voter” registration, which allows anyone with a driver’s license to become a voter, regardless of citizenship status; and supports tax hikes and socialized medicine.

League of Young Voters: This organization seeks to “empowe[r] young people nationwide” to “participate in the democratic process and create progressive political change on the local, state and national level[s].”

Lynne Stewart Defense Committee: IRS records indicate that Soros’s Open Society Institute made a September 2002 grant of $20,000 to this organization. Stewart was the criminal-defense attorney who was later convicted for abetting her client, the “blind sheik” Omar Abdel Rahman, in terrorist activities connected with his Islamic Group.

Machsom Watch: This organization describes itself as “a movement of Israeli women, peace activists from all sectors of Israeli society, who oppose the Israeli occupation and the denial of Palestinians’ rights to move freely in their land.”

MADRE: This international women’s organization deems America the world’s foremost violator of human rights. As such, it seeks to “communicat[e] the real-life impact of U.S. policies on women and families confronting violence, poverty and repression around the world,” and to “demand alternatives to destructive U.S. policies.” It also advocates unrestricted access to taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand.

Malcolm X Grassroots Movement: This group views the U.S. as a nation replete with racism and discrimination against blacks; seeks to establish an independent black nation in the southeastern United States; and demands reparations for slavery.

Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition: This group calls for the expansion of civil rights and liberties for illegal aliens; laments that illegal aliens in America are commonly subjected to “worker exploitation”; supports tuition-assistance programs for illegal aliens attending college; and characterizes the Patriot Act as a “very troubling” assault on civil liberties.

Media Fund: Soros played a major role in creating this group, whose purpose was to conceptualize, produce, and place political ads on television, radio, print, and the Internet.

Media Matters for America: This organization is a “web-based, not-for-profit … progressive research and information center” seeking to “systematically monitor a cross-section of print, broadcast, cable, radio, and Internet media outlets for conservative misinformation.” The group works closely with the Soros-backed Center for American Progress, and is heavily funded by Democracy Alliance, of which Soros is a major financier.

Mercy Corps: Vis a vis the Arab-Israeli conflict, Mercy Corps places all blame for Palestinian poverty and suffering directly on Israel.

Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund: This group advocates open borders, free college tuition for illegal aliens, lowered educational standards to accommodate Hispanics, and voting rights for criminals. In MALDEF’s view, supporters of making English the official language of the United States are “motivated by racism and anti-immigrant sentiments,” while advocates of sanctions against employers reliant on illegal labor seek to discriminate against “brown-skinned people.”

Meyer, Suozzi, English and Klein, PC: This influential defender of Big Labor is headed by Democrat operativeHarold Ickes.

Midwest Academy: This entity trains radical activists in the tactics of direct action, targeting, confrontation, and intimidation.

Migration Policy Institute: This group seeks to create “a North America with gradually disappearing border controls … with permanent migration remaining at moderate levels.”

Military Families Speak Out: This group ascribes the U.S. invasion of Iraq to American imperialism and lust for oil.

Missourians Organizing for Reform and Empowerment: This group is the rebranded Missouri branch of the now-defunct, pro-socialist, community organization ACORN.

MoveOn.org: This Web-based organization supports Democratic political candidates through fundraising, advertising, and get-out-the-vote drives.

Ms. Foundation for Women: This group laments what it views as the widespread and enduring flaws of American society: racism, sexism, homophobia, and the violation of civil rights and liberties. It focuses its philanthropy on groups that promote affirmative action for women, unfettered access to taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand, amnesty for illegal aliens, and big government generally.

Muslim Advocates: Opposed to U.S. counter-terrorism strategies that make use of sting operations and informants, MA characterizes such tactics as forms of “entrapment” that are inherently discriminatory against Muslims.

NARAL Pro-Choice America: This group supports taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand, and works to elect pro-abortion Democrats.

NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund: The NAACP supports racial preferences in employment and education, as well as the racial gerrymandering of voting districts. Underpinning its support for race preferences is the fervent belief that white racism in the United States remains an intractable, largely undiminished, phenomenon.

The Nation Institute: This nonprofit entity sponsors leftist conferences, fellowships, awards for radical activists, and journalism internships.

National Abortion Federation: This group opposes any restrictions on abortion at either the state or federal levels, and champions the introduction of unrestricted abortion into developing regions of the world.

National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty: This group was established in 1976 as the first “fully staffed national organization exclusively devoted to abolishing capital punishment.”

National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy: This group depicts the United States as a nation in need of dramatic structural change financed by philanthropic organizations. It overwhelmingly promotes grant-makers and grantees with leftist agendas, while criticizing their conservative counterparts.

National Committee for Voting Integrity: This group opposes “the implementation of proof of citizenship and photo identification requirements for eligible electors in American elections as the means of assuring election integrity.”

National Council for Research on Women: This group supports big government, high taxes, military spending cuts, increased social welfare spending, and the unrestricted right to taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand.

National Council of La Raza: This group lobbies for racial preferences, bilingual education, stricter hate-crime laws, mass immigration, and amnesty for illegal aliens.

National Council of Women’s Organizations: This group views the United States as a nation rife with injustice against girls and women. It advocates high levels of spending for social welfare programs, and supports race and gender preferences for minorities and women in business and academia.

National Immigration Forum: Opposing the enforcement of present immigration laws, this organization urges the American government to “legalize” en masse all illegal aliens currently in the United States who have no criminal records, and to dramatically increase the number of visas available for those wishing to migrate to the U.S. The Forum is particularly committed to opening the borders to unskilled, low-income workers, and immediately making them eligible for welfare and social service programs.

National Immigration Law Center: This group seeks to win unrestricted access to government-funded social welfare programs for illegal aliens.

National Lawyers Guild: This group promotes open borders; seeks to weaken America’s intelligence-gathering agencies; condemns the Patriot Act as an assault on civil liberties; rejects capitalism as an unviable economic system; has rushed to the defense of convicted terrorists and their abettors; and generally opposes all U.S. foreign policy positions, just as it did during the Cold War when it sided with the Soviets.

National Organization for Women: This group advocates the unfettered right to taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand; seeks to “eradicate racism, sexism and homophobia” from American society; attacks Christianity and traditional religious values; and supports gender-based preferences for women.

National Partnership for Women and Families: This organization supports race- and sex-based preferences in employment and education. It also advocates for the universal “right” of women to undergo taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand at any stage of pregnancy and for any reason.

National Priorities Project: This group supports government-mandated redistribution of wealth — through higher taxes and greater expenditures on social welfare programs. NPP exhorts the government to redirect a significant portion of its military funding toward public education, universal health insurance, environmentalist projects, and welfare programs.

National Public Radio: Founded in 1970 with 90 public radio stations as charter members, NPR is today a loose network of more than 750 U.S. radio stations across the country, many of which are based on college and university campuses. (source)

National Security Archive Fund: This group collects and publishes declassified documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act to a degree that compromises American national security and the safety of intelligence agents.

National Women’s Law Center: This group supports taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand; lobbies against conservative judicial appointees; advocates increased welfare spending to help low-income mothers; and favors higher taxes for the purpose of generating more funds for such government programs as Medicaid, food stamps, welfare, foster care, health care, child-support enforcement, and student loans.

Natural Resources Defense Council: One of the most influential environmentalist lobbying groups in the United States, the Council claims a membership of one million people.

New America Foundation: This organization uses policy papers, media articles, books, and educational events to influence public opinion on such topics as healthcare, environmentalism, energy policy, the Mideast conflict, global governance, and much more.

New Israel Fund: This organization gives support to NGOs that regularly produce reports accusing Israel of human-rights violations and religious persecution.

NewsCorpWatch: A project of Media Matters For America, NewsCorpWatch was established with the help of a $1 million George Soros grant to Media Matters.

Pacifica Foundation: This entity owns and operates Pacifica Radio, awash from its birth with the socialist-Marxist rhetoric of class warfare and hatred for capitalism.

Palestinian Center for Human Rights: This NGO investigates and documents what it views as Israeli human-rights violations against Palestinians.

Peace and Security Funders Group: This is an association of more than 60 foundations that give money to leftist anti-war and environmentalist causes. Its members tend to depict America as the world’s chief source of international conflict, environmental destruction, and economic inequalities.

Peace Development Fund: In PDF’s calculus, the United States needs a massive overhaul of its social and economic institutions. “Recently,” explains PDF, “we have witnessed the negative effects of neo-liberalism and the globalization of capitalism, the de-industrialization of the U.S. and the growing gap between the rich and poor …”

People for the American Way: This group opposes the Patriot Act, anti-terrorism measures generally, and the allegedly growing influence of the “religious right.”

People Improving Communities Through Organizing: This group uses Alinsky-style organizing tactics to advance the doctrines of the religious left.

Physicians for Human Rights: This group is selectively and disproportionately critical of the United States and Israel in its condemnations of human rights violations.

Physicians for Social Responsibility: This is an anti-U.S.-military organization that also embraces the tenets of radical environmentalism.

Planned Parenthood: This group is the largest abortion provider in the United States and advocates taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand.

Ploughshares Fund: This public grantmaking foundation opposes America’s development of a missile defense system, and contributes to many organizations that are highly critical of U.S. foreign policies and military ventures.

Prepare New York: This group supported the proposed construction of a Muslim Community Center near Ground Zero in lower Manhattan – a project known as the Cordoba Initiative, headed by Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf.

Presidential Climate Action Project: PCAP’s mission is to create a new 21st-century economy, completely carbon-free and based largely on renewable energy. A key advisor to the organization is the revolutionary communist Van Jones.

Prison Moratorium Project: This initiative was created in 1995 for the express purpose of working for the elimination of all prisons in the United States and the release of all inmates. Reasoning from the premise that incarceration is never an appropriate means of dealing with crime, it deems American society’s inherent inequities the root of all criminal behavior.

Progressive Change Campaign Committee: This organization works “to elect bold progressive candidates to federal office and to help [them] and their campaigns save money, work smarter, and win more often.”

Progressive States Network: PSN’s mission is to “pass progressive legislation in all fifty states by providing coordinated research and strategic advocacy tools to forward-thinking state legislators.”

Project Vote: This is the voter-mobilization arm of the Soros-funded ACORN. A persistent pattern of lawlessness and corruption has followed ACORN/Project Vote activities over the years.

Pro Publica: Claiming that “investigative journalism is at risk,” this group aims to remedy this lacuna in news publishing by “expos[ing] abuses of power and betrayals of the public trust by government, business, and other institutions, using the moral force of investigative journalism to spur reform through the sustained spotlighting of wrongdoing.”

Proteus Fund: This foundation directs its philanthropy toward a number of radical leftwing organizations.

Psychologists for Social Responsibility: This anti-capitalist, anti-corporate, anti-military, anti-American organization “uses psychological knowledge and skills to promote peace with social justice at the community, national and international levels.”

Public Citizen Foundation: Public Citizen seeks increased government intervention and litigation against corporations — a practice founded on the notion that American corporations, like the capitalist system of which they are a part, are inherently inclined toward corruption.

Public Justice Center: Viewing America as a nation rife with injustice and discrimination, this organization engages in legislative and policy advocacy to promote “systemic change for the disenfranchised.”

Rebuild and Renew America Now (a.k.a. Unity ’09): Spearheaded by MoveOn.org and overseen by longtime activist Heather Booth, this coalition was formed to facilitate the passage of President Obama’s “historic” $3.5 trillion budget for fiscal year 2010.

Res Publica: Seeking to advance far-left agendas in places all around the world, RP specializes in “E-advocacy,” or web-based movement-building.

Roosevelt Institute: Proceeding from the premise that free-market capitalism is inherently unjust and prone to periodic collapses caused by its own structural flaws, RI currently administers several major projects aimed at reshaping the American economy to more closely resemble a socialist system.

Secretary of State Project: This project was launched in July 2006 as an independent “527” organization devoted to helping Democrats get elected to the office of Secretary of State in selected swing, or battleground, states.

Sentencing Project: Asserting that prison-sentencing patterns are racially discriminatory, this initiative advocates voting rights for felons.

Social Justice Leadership: This organization seeks to transform an allegedly inequitable America into a “just society” by means of “a renewed social-justice movement.”

Shadow Democratic Party: This is an elaborate network of non-profit activist groups organized by George Soros and others to mobilize resources — money, get-out-the-vote drives, campaign advertising, and policy iniatives — to elect Democratic candidates and guide the Democratic Party towards the left.

Sojourners: This evangelical Christian ministry preaches radical leftwing politics. During the 1980s it championed Communist revolution in Central America and chastised U.S. policy-makers for their tendency “to assume the very worst about their Soviet counterparts.” More recently, Sojourners has taken up the cause of environmental activism, opposed welfare reform as a “mean-spirited Republican agenda,” and mounted a defense of affirmative action.

Southern Poverty Law Center: This organization monitors the activities of what it calls “hate groups” in the United States. It exaggerates the prevalence of white racism directed against American minorities.

State Voices: This coalition helps independent local activist groups in 22 states work collaboratively on a year-round basis, so as to maximize the impact of their efforts.

Talking Transition: This was a two-week project launched in early November 2013 to “help shape the transition” to City Hall for the newly elected Democratic mayor of New York, Bill de Blasio.

Think Progress: This Internet blog “pushes back, daily,” by its own account, against its conservative targets, and seeks to transform “progressive ideas into policy through rapid response communications, legislative action, grassroots organizing and advocacy, and partnerships with other progressive leaders throughout the country and the world.”

Thunder Road Group: This political consultancy, in whose creation Soros had a hand, coordinates strategy for the Media Fund, America Coming Together, and America Votes.

Tides Foundation and Tides Center: Tides is a major funder of the radical Left.

U.S. Public Interest Research Group: This is an umbrella organization of student groups that support leftist agendas.

Universal Healthcare Action Network: This organization supports a single-payer health care system controlled by the federal government.

Urban Institute: This research organization favors socialized medicine, expansion of the federal welfare bureaucracy, and tax hikes for higher income-earners.

USAction Education Fund: USAction lists its priorities as: “fighting the right wing agenda”; “building grassroots political power”; winning “social, racial and economic justice for all”; supporting a system of taxpayer-funded socialized medicine; reversing “reckless tax cuts for millionaires and corporations” which shield the “wealthy” from paying their “fair share”; advocating for “pro-consumer and environmental regulation of corporate abuse”; “strengthening progressive voices on local, state and national issues”; and working to “register, educate and get out the vote … [to] help progressives get elected at all levels of government.”

Voter Participation Center: This organization seeks to increase voter turnout among unmarried women, “people of color,” and 18-to-29-year-olds — demographics that are heavily pro-Democrat.

Voto Latino: This group seeks to mobilize Latin-Americans to become registered voters and political activists.

We Are America Alliance: This coalition promotes “increased civic participation by immigrants” in the American political process.

Working Families Party: An outgrowth of the socialist New Party, WFP seeks to help push the Democratic Party toward the left.

World Organization Against Torture: This coalition works closely with groups that condemn Israeli security measures against Palestinian terrorism.

YWCA World Office, Switzerland: The YWCA opposes abstinence education; supports universal access to taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand; and opposes school vouchers.

B. Organizaciones que no reciben financiación directa de Soros y OSF, pero son financiadas por una o más organizaciones que sí:

1. Center for Progressive Leadership: Funded by the Soros-bankrolled Democracy Alliance, this anti-capitalist organization is dedicated to training future leftist political leaders.
2. John Adams Project:This project of the American Civil Liberties Union was accused of: (a) having hired investigators to photograph CIA officers thought to have been involved in enhanced interrogations of terror suspects detained in Guantanamo, and then (b) showing the photos to the attorneys of those suspects, some of whom were senior al-Qaeda operatives.
3. Moving Ideas Network (MIN): This coalition of more than 250 leftwing activist groups is a partner organization of the Soros-backed Center for American Progress. MIN was originally a project of the Soros-backed American Prospect and, as such, received indirect funding from the Open Society Institute. In early 2006, The American Prospect relinquished control of the Moving Ideas Network.
4. New Organizing Institute: Created by the Soros-funded MoveOn.org, this group “trains young, technology-enabled political organizers to work for progressive campaigns and organizations.”
5. Think Progress: This “project” of the American Progress Action Fund, which is a “sister advocacy organization”of the Soros-funded Center for American Progress and Campus Progress, seeks to transform “progressive ideas into policy through rapid response communications, legislative action, grassroots organizing and advocacy, and partnerships with other progressive leaders throughout the country and the world.”
6. Vote for Change: Coordinated by the political action committee of the Soros-funded MoveOn.org, Vote for Change was a group of 41 musicians and bands that performed concerts in several key election “battleground”states during October 2004, to raise money in support of Democrat John Kerry‘s presidential bid.
7. Working Families Party: Created in 1998 to help push the Democratic Party toward the left, this front group for the Soros-funded ACORN functions as a political party that promotes ACORN-friendly candidates.

Fuente: https://realisticobserver.blogspot.com/2017/04/fyi-206-us-organizations-funded-by.html

EN 27 SEPTIEMBRE, 2020

https://cazadebunkers.wordpress.com/2020/09/27/lista-completa-de-organizaciones-estadounidenses-financiadas-por-george-soros/

Trump se protege: Nuevo Intento de Golpe de Estado, combinado con un intento de asesinato por Comandos Ucranianos

TRUMP SE HA RECLUIDO POR UN NUEVO INTENTO DE GOLPE DE ESTADO, COMBINADO CON UN INTENTO DE ASESINATO POR PARTE DE COMANDOS UCRANIOS. 

El contraalmirante y jefe del Comando Especial Naval, Colin Green, que expresó su desprecio contra Trump hace meses, ha intentado en las últimas fechas con provocar una guerra entre Rusia y Estados Unidos en el Mar Negro, organizando unos ejericicios de guerra. 

Al tiempo, ordenaba al agregado militar norteamericano en la embajada de Ucrania, emitir visados a un grupo de francotiradores “por razones desconocidas”, ocurriendo que el avión en el que viajaban hacia USA fue derribado el 25 de septiembre, muriendo todos sus ocupantes, siendo asesinado el día 30 de septiembre el citado agregado militar.

Podréis deducir de este relato que el contraalmirante traidor había organizado el asesinato de Donald Trump, un intento que ha sido abortado por las fuerzas patriotas, y que ha sido la verdadera razón por la cual Donald Trump y su esposa han resultado “positivos al Covid” y han entrado en un periodo de reclusión, para evitar males mayores. 

http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index3350.htm

EN 2 OCTUBRE, 2020 POR MUELASGAITAN

https://muelasgaitan.wordpress.com/2020/10/02/trump-se-ha-recluido-por-un-nuevo-intento-de-golpe-de-estado-combinado-con-un-intento-de-asesinato-por-parte-de-comandos-ucranios/

Descubren Pequeños Seres que son Capaces de Algo Increíble

Cómo calcular la trayectoria de tu vida y los números de destino

¿Alguna vez has mirado el reloj y has visto exactamente a las 11:11? ¿Por qué hay tantas personas nacidas el mismo día del mes? ¿Por qué tu número de la suerte aparece en los lugares más inesperados? Las respuestas que buscas están en el interior de los poderes esotéricos de los dígitos. La numerología es el estudio místico de los números. 

Así como la astrología, los planetas y los signos del zodíaco están conectados a atributos específicos dentro de la astrología, según las enseñanzas de la numerología, ciertos números están asociados con rasgos o temas específicos. Estos números se utilizan para ofrecer información sobre la personalidad, eventos futuros e incluso el mayor propósito de la vida.

Según los expertos en la materia, la numerología es la compañera de la astrología. Ayuda a aclarar el signo al proporcionar matices adicionales, además de mejorar la comprensión de uno mismo al revelar no solo cómo se expresa, sino dónde emite su energía inherente. La numerología también es una gran herramienta para dar sentido a los dígitos recurrentes. 

La repetición numérica y la sincronicidad se han observado durante miles de años. La numerología caldea se basa en antiguas prácticas babilónicas, y los estudios cabalísticos del misticismo judío exploran dígitos recurrentes dentro del Antiguo Testamento. De hecho, muchos ocultistas creen que la aparición del 11:11 está relacionada con el tetragrámaton, el nombre impronunciable de cuatro letras del Dios de Israel.

La numerología que se practica con más frecuencia en la actualidad se basa en las enseñanzas del antiguo filósofo griego Pitágoras. Pitágoras era un matemático brillante, pero no solo le interesaban las soluciones cuantitativas. Creía que el mundo físico estaba compuesto por las vibraciones energéticas de los números y desarrolló un sistema que correspondía letras con números enteros. 

Su práctica fue un estudio de interconectividad numérica. Pero no es necesario ser un experto en matemáticas para explorar la magia de la numerología. Todo lo que necesitas para comenzar a descubrir las propiedades místicas de los números es un bolígrafo, papel y algo de aritmética simple (o la calculadora).

Cómo calcular el número de trayectoria de tu vida

La forma más sencilla de empezar a trabajar con la numerología es analizando tu fecha de nacimiento única. La numerología se trata de llegar al número raíz. Para calcular esto, simplemente reduce los dígitos hasta llegar a un número de un solo dígito, excluyendo 11 y 22, que se consideran números maestros. Este único dígito es su número de trayectoria de vida individual.

El número de la trayectoria de la vida es similar a tu signo solar astrológico: revela tu mayor propósito, incluidas las fortalezas, debilidades, talentos y ambiciones. También expone el tono de tus experiencias y por qué ocurren los eventos pasados, presentes y futuros. En pocas palabras, es el diario de todas tus vidas. Por ejemplo, tu cumpleaños es el 15 de diciembre de 1992. Para calcular tu número de trayectoria de vida, reduce cada componente de esta fecha a un solo dígito:

El mes 12 se reduce a 1 + 2 = 3.

La fecha, 14, se reduce a 1 + 5 = 6.

El año 1992 se reduce a 1 + 9 + 9 + 2. Esto es igual a 21. Entonces, 21 se reduce a 2 + 1 = 3.

Luego, sumamos los números reducidos de mes, fecha y año (3 + 6 + 3) y llegamos a 12. Finalmente, sumamos 1 + 2 y llegamos a 3. Si naciste el 15 de diciembre de 1992, tu número de trayectoria de vida es 3. Puede parecer complicado al principio, pero cuando lo hagas una y otra vez, será mucho más sencillo.

Números maestros

Como hemos comentado anteriormente, la única vez que no se reduce el número final es si se trata del número 11 o 22. Estos se consideran números maestros y connotan una versión más intensificada de sus números raíz (2 y 4, respectivamente). Los números maestros sugieren un alto grado de aprendizaje, logro o éxito, pero probablemente en un entorno más estresante o de alta presión.

Conversión de letras para encontrar su número de destino

También puedes usar la numerología para derivar el número raíz de nombres o palabras. Según las teorías de Pitágoras, determinadas letras tienen valores numéricos específicos, que son los siguientes:

1 = A, J, S

2 = B, K, T

3 = C, L, U

4 = D, M, V

5 = E, N, W

6 = F, O, X

7 = G, P, Y

8 = H, Q, Z

9 = yo, R

Con esta técnica, es fácil encontrar el número raíz asociado con los nombres, a los que los numerólogos se refieren como Número de Destino.

Para encontrar tu Número de Destino, calcula el número raíz de tu nombre completo (primer nombre, segundo nombre, apellido) reduciendo cada nombre a un solo dígito y sumando el total. Mientras que tu Camino de Vida revela tu propósito mayor, tu Número de Destino ofrece información sobre tus metas más importantes.

Interpretaciones de números

Entonces, ahora que has calculado tu Número de trayectoria de vida y Número de destino, es momento de descubrir qué significan realmente estos dígitos.

Número 1

Así como Aries, el primer signo del zodíaco, trata sobre la acción y la iniciación, en la numerología el 1 está vinculado al movimiento hacia adelante. 1 simboliza un espíritu pionero, naturaleza independiente y capacidades de liderazgo innatas. 

En un mal día, puedes ser un poco autoritario, ocultando cualquier inseguridad detrás de una importancia personal demasiado desarrollada. Debe recordar que, aunque es el primero, puede convertirse rápidamente en el número más solitario. Incluso los 1 más autónomos necesitan el apoyo de sus amigos, familiares y parejas sentimentales.

Número 2

2 está vinculado a la sensibilidad, el equilibrio y la armonía. Dentro de la numerología, la vibración 2 asume el papel de mediador, creando armonía al unir fuerzas disonantes a través de la compasión, la empatía y la bondad. 2 está vinculado a las habilidades psíquicas y la intuición, y si este número aparece como un Camino de Vida o Número de Destino, la persona será astuta a los cambios de energía sutiles y los matices emocionales. 

Debido a que 2 es tan sensible, es muy reacio a los conflictos y puede terminar sintiéndose subestimado o no reconocido. Debes evitar buscar la validación externa y, en cambio, darte cuenta de que el equilibrio perfecto necesario ya existe dentro.

Número 3

La comunicación es primordial para el 3. Simbólicamente, 3 representa el resultado de dos fuerzas unidas: es la esencia de la creación. 3 tiene un gran talento para la expresión y comparte a la perfección conceptos innovadores y pioneros a través del arte, la escritura y la oración. Su trabajo inspira, motiva y anima a otros, y 3 encuentra una gran alegría al hacer sonreír a los demás. 

Sin embargo, también se sabe que 3 es bastante temperamental, y si se siente incomprendido, puede retirarse por completo. Las tendencias escapistas de 3 se mitigan fácilmente practicando la atención pacífica: con una imaginación tan activa, es importante que 3 encuentre momentos de tranquilidad para restablecer, restaurar y recargar.

Número 4

En la numerología, el 4 tiene una energía terrenal y se centra en fortalecer sus raíces. 4 cree firmemente en el mundo físico y sabe que invertir en una infraestructura sólida es necesario para construir un legado duradero. Práctico, trabajador y responsable, la vibración del número 4 se centra en la creación de sistemas lógicos que puedan soportar un crecimiento escalable. 

Sin embargo, hay una solidez en 4 que rápidamente puede convertirse en rigidez; Debe recordar que las reglas están destinadas a mejorar, no a inhibir. Es fácil que 4 se vuelva terco, por lo que se beneficia de aprender a relajarse y pensar de manera innovadora. 4 se sentirá liberado e inspirado al encontrar la valentía para tomar algunos riesgos audaces.

Número 5

Librepensador, aventurero y progresista, 5 se define por la libertad. 5 necesita experimentar el mundo activando sus cinco sentidos: para 5, las lecciones de vida se adquieren a través de actos espontáneos de valentía. Similar a la energía de Sagitario dentro de la astrología, 5 es conocido por su espíritu juguetón, impulsivo y vivaz. Pero al otro lado de su alegría de vivir característica, pueden volverse inquietos e impacientes. Dado que 5 siempre busca descubrimientos, le resulta difícil aceptar las responsabilidades del día a día, incluidos los compromisos profesionales e interpersonales.

Número 6

6 es reconocido por su naturaleza afectiva, solidaria y empática. Un verdadero sanador, tiene la capacidad de resolver problemas tanto en el ámbito emocional como físico, ayudando a otros a través de su enfoque sencillo pero suave. 6 tiene un fuerte sentido de la responsabilidad y se preocupa profundamente por sus amigos, familiares y pareja. 

Este número también puede comunicarse fácilmente con niños y animales, mostrando una ternura suave y un espíritu protector. Pero no todo necesita ser criado por padres y, a veces, la energía protectora de 6 puede volverse dominante y controladora. Para evitar llevar el peso del mundo, deben aprender a generar confianza y comprensión hacia los demás: en pocas palabras, todos deben seguir su propio camino único.

Número 7

Para los numerólogos, el 7 es conocido por sus habilidades investigativas y analíticas. Astrológicamente, el número 7 se puede considerar como una mezcla de energía de Virgo y Escorpio: está extremadamente orientado a los detalles, pero está impulsado por la sabiduría interior en oposición a las realidades tangibles. 7 tiene un buen ojo y sus observaciones alimentan un espíritu ingenioso y rápido.

 Debido a que puede encontrar rápidamente las fallas en casi cualquier sistema, 7 es un poco perfeccionista. También asumirá la culpa, por lo que es importante que este número contrarreste su escepticismo inherente con una mente abierta. No todo será infalible, pero eso es lo que hace la vida divertida.

Número 8

El 8 tiene que ver con la abundancia. Dentro de la numerología, este número está relacionado con la riqueza material y el éxito financiero. Ambicioso y orientado a objetivos, 8 puede asumir sin esfuerzo posiciones de liderazgo gracias a su magnetismo natural. Aplica el pensamiento de imagen grande para ampliar su alcance. 

Pero un gran poder conlleva una gran responsabilidad: son adictos al trabajo y, en un mal día, pueden volverse excesivamente controladores y posesivos. Sin embargo, sus cualidades negativas pueden reducirse contribuyendo a la comunidad. Al utilizar su éxito para ayudar a otros, 8 se da cuenta de que no hay nada más valioso que contribuir al bien común.

Número 9

Como último dígito dentro de la numerología, el 9 es considerado un alma vieja. Puede sintetizar sin esfuerzo grandes cantidades de estímulos, conectando psíquicamente los puntos para formar un todo cohesivo. 

La misión de 9 es alcanzar su estado más alto de conciencia y ayudar a otros a lograr también esta conciencia espiritual. 9 no tiene miedo de transformarse, y su espíritu inspira a otros a explorar sus propios rangos de movimiento. Dado que el 9, en muchos sentidos, ha trascendido el plano físico, debe aprender a equilibrar lo abstracto con lo tangible, encontrando finalmente su lugar en la intersección de la fantasía y la realidad.

Número maestro 11

El Número Maestro 11 acelera la energía del Número 2; su propósito es curarse a sí mismo y a los demás a través de sus elevadas habilidades psíquicas. En ocasiones, los dones intuitivos del Maestro Número 11 son el resultado de circunstancias extremas de la vida. En la numerología, el 11 está conectado con la iluminación espiritual, la conciencia y el equilibrio filosófico.

Número maestro 22

El Número Maestro 22, es conocido como el Constructor Maestro, amplía las vibraciones del Número 4. El 22 está inspirado para crear plataformas en el ámbito físico que trascienden las realidades inmediatas: al fusionar lo tangible e intangible, cultiva una dinámica legado a largo plazo. Las habilidades suelen ser un subproducto de la inestabilidad de la primera infancia que alimenta el pensamiento innovador. Trabajador, creativo y confiable, el 22 siempre tiene la misión de transformar.

El lenguaje del universo

Como hemos podido comprobar, la numerología esotérica nos ayuda a comprender el significado espiritual y la progresión ordenada de todas las manifestaciones. La numerología es otra forma en que podemos ver visualmente cuándo ocurre la sincronicidad en nuestras vidas. 

Un patrón específico de números que es específico para ti puede aparecer como una señal de que estás en el camino correcto, un guiño del Universo de que estás exactamente donde debes estar. Pero también está asociado a nuestras vidas y nuestro destino, y que nada ocurre por causalidad, ya sean desgracias o momentos felices. Cuanto más aprendas sobre los números, más podrás comprender tu misión en la vida.

Por MEP

Publicado el 01/10/2020

No sólo Madrid: 8 comunidades ya tienen el mayor riesgo de contagio del mundo

CRISIS DEL CORONAVIRUS

Illa hace trampas: no cuenta 900 UCI de Madrid para someterla al criterio que obliga al cierre

Mapa de las comunidades que superan a Argentina, peor país del mundo en riesgo de contagio.

PELAYO BARRO

02/10/2020 06:45

La Comunidad de Madrid se prepara para un posible confinamiento de la capital y otros municipios especialmente afectados por la segunda ola de la pandemia. Una restricción de la movilidad impuesta por el Ministerio de Sanidad contra el criterio del Gobierno autonómico. No habrá más confinamientos a nivel nacional: a pesar de que ya hay 8 comunidades autónomas que superan el riesgo de contagio de Argentina, peor país del mundo, el Gobierno de Pedro Sánchez centra toda su acción en Madrid.

Ya hay ocho regiones -aparte de Madrid- cuya incidencia acumulada supera los 329 casos de contagio por cada 100.000 habitantes.

Esa barrera simboliza el riesgo de contagio que muestra este jueves Argentina, el país con peores cifras en cuanto a riesgo de contagio. Es uno de los tres indicadores marcados por Sanidad para evaluar qué zonas y cuáles no deben ser confinadas. El departamento de Salvador Illa ha establecido el límite en los 500 contagios y sólo Madrid cumple con todos los criterios (los dos restantes son la ocupación UCI al 35% y positividad máxima del 10%)

Según los últimos datos ofrecidos por Sanidad este miércoles, Madrid muestra una incidencia acumulada de 735 casos de contagio por cada 100.000 habitantes (con 1.586 casos diagnosticados, aunque la Comunidad notificó 1.205). Navarra muestra un riesgo de contagio de 681, La Rioja de 460, Castilla-La Mancha de 422, Castilla y León 386, Murcia de 385, Aragón de 370, Extremadura de 277 y País Vasco de 268.

Tabla de datos del Ministerio de Sanidad.

En total, las comunidades autónomas que superan en riesgo de contagio al hasta ahora peor país del mundo en incidencia acumulada representan una bolsa de 18 millones de habitantes. De ellos, sólo seis residen en Madrid. Para los 12 restantes no se ha anunciado ninguna ‘receta’ por parte del Gobierno de Sánchez.

Madrid y sólo Madrid

La Comunidad de Madrid ha denunciado en las últimas horas que los criterios establecidos por Moncloa y Sanidad están milimétricamente diseñados para encajar únicamente en el traje a Madrid. Aceptará el posible confinamiento, pero dará la batalla legal.

La precisión es quirúrgica: sólo Madrid tiene una ocupación de las UCI que supera el 40%, a pesar de que la región asegura disponer de más capacidad de la que cuenta Sanidad. Tal y como ha informado OKDIARIO, el Ministerio le otorga 1.000 camas pero Madrid defiende que puede tener 1.900, lo que rebajaría la tasa hasta un 25%-26% y dejaría a Madrid fuera del confinamiento. Logroño, por ejemplo, cumple con todos los criterios pero tiene una ocupación de las UCI del 33,9%. Se salva por apenas un 1%.

Por ello, Madrid exigió este miércoles durante la reunión del Consejo Interterritorial del Sistema Nacional de Sanidad que se explicasen los fundamentos científicos y técnicos de los umbrales marcados por Sanidad. La sospecha del gobierno autonómico es que se ha dictado un confinamiento a la carta para Madrid.

Mortalidad más baja de la segunda ola

Por otra parte, los datos del Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE) avalan que es la comunidad con menor tasa de mortalidad de toda España en la segunda ola del coronavirus.

Los datos obtenidos por OKDIARIO demuestran que la tasa de mortalidad nacional medida entre el 27 de julio y el 13 de septiembre (últimos datos recopilados por el INE) se sitúa en 15,76 fallecidos por cada 100.000 habitantes mientras que la de Madrid es de 7,74.

Madrid es, de hecho, la que menor dato muestra en esta clasificación. Andalucía muestra un dato de 15,93 muertos por cada 100.000 habitantes; Aragón se sitúa en 47,3; Asturias refleja 25,54 fallecimientos; Baleares 19,76; Canarias 11,65; Cantabria 7,75; Castilla y León 25,51; Castilla-La Mancha 18,8; Cataluña de 11,24; Comunidad Valenciana 20,11; Extremadura 22; Galicia 12,26; Murcia 15,26; Navarra 12,54; País Vasco 12,32; y La Rioja 36,39.

La orden en el BOE

El Boletín Oficial del Estado publica este jueves la resolución del Ministerio de Sanidad que salió adelante el miércoles sin consenso en la reunión del Consejo Interterritorial de Salud, que supone la aplicación de nuevas restricciones en Madrid y las grandes ciudades con mayor impacto de coronavirus y que será de «obligado cumplimiento» en un plazo de 48 horas.

«Este acuerdo será de obligado cumplimiento para todas las comunidades y ciudades autónomas integrantes del Consejo Interterritorial del Sistema Nacional de Salud», señala el BOE, incluidas las que han rechazado expresamente las medidas, como Madrid, Andalucía, Cataluña, Galicia y Ceuta.

El Gobierno explica en el BOE que la situación epidemiológica actual hace que además de las medidas ya instauradas como el uso obligatorio de la mascarilla, la prohibición de fumar si no se cumple la distancia de seguridad o el cierre de la restauración a la una de la mañana es necesario la «implementación de medidas más estrictas que permitan facilitar el control de la epidemia en aquellos territorios más afectados por la misma».

https://okdiario.com/espana/no-solo-madrid-8-comunidades-ya-tienen-mayor-riesgo-contagio-del-mundo-6216483

Leyendas urbanas y antiguos mitos: espíritus y seres terroríficos que acechan en el lavabo

Todos los países del mundo tienen sus propias leyendas y supersticiones, basadas a menudo en creencias relacionadas con dioses, demonios y espíritus que habitan en un cierto lugar. Hasta los lavabos tienen asociadas sus propias criaturas del ‘otro mundo’.

Toire no Hanako-san: Hanako la del lavabo

En Japón, Toire no Hanako-san (que significa “Hanako la del lavabo”) es el espíritu de una niña con media melena lisa y negra que viste una falda roja y se esconde en el tercer lavabo del tercer piso de los baños de los colegios japoneses. Quien quiera invocar a Hanako debe llamar a la puerta del tercer lavabo tres veces y preguntar si está ahí o no.

Por lo general se considera a Hanako un espíritu inofensivo, pero existen también versiones de esta leyenda urbana más violentas y terroríficas. En una de ellas, tras responder a quien la ha invocado, le arrastra hasta el interior del lavabo si la puerta estaba abierta. Al parecer se la puede detener si el individuo puede demostrar que ha sacado un diez en un examen. Otra terrorífica versión de esta leyenda habla de un gigantesco lagarto con tres cabezas que simula la voz de una niña para atraer a su presa.

Hanako la del lavabo. (Imagen original)

Kawaya no Kami: un dios protector nacido de los excrementos

La mitología japonesa también nos habla de Kawaya no Kami, el dios del lavabo nacido de los excrementos de la diosa Izanami. Al ser los antiguos lavabos más antiguos y peligrosos que los actuales, se creía en el pasado que Kawaya no Kami protegía a sus usuarios.

En señal de respeto por este dios, la gente mantenía limpios sus lavabos, los decoraba como si de un santuario se tratase e incluso cenaban en ellos para simbolizar que comían los alimentos dejados por el dios. Cuando la gente no era lo suficientemente respetuosa con este dios del lavabo, se decía que sus hijos nacían feos e infelices. Asimismo, al utilizar el lavabo la gente debía advertir de su presencia tosiendo, ya que se decía que Kawaya no Kami tenía la forma de un hombre ciego armado con una lanza y oculto en el fondo del lavabo.

Aka-Manto

Muy conocido en Japón y Corea, Aka-Manto es un espíritu maligno de los lavabos. Se cuenta que lleva puesta una máscara blanca y viste una capa roja. Supuestamente, las mujeres le encuentran muy atractivo. Este espíritu habita en los compartimentos de los lavabos, y cuando alguien entra en uno de ellos, el espíritu le pregunta si prefiere una capa roja o una capa azul.

Si el usuario del lavabo responde ‘roja’, el espíritu le corta el cuello, para que la sangre derramada recuerde a una capa roja. Si responde azul, el individuo será asfixiado hasta la muerte, para que su rostro adquiera una tonalidad azulada. Si la persona intenta engañar al espíritu diciendo otro color, será arrastrada al Infierno a través del retrete. La única forma de escapar a la muerte al encontrarse con este espíritu maligno es respondiendo “amarilla”. Al hacerlo así, el espíritu se ‘conformará’ con restregar la cara del individuo en algún lavabo lleno de excrementos.

Representación artística del espíritu de Aka-Manto. (YouTube Screenshot)

El Demonio de la Máscara de la Muerte: Kashima Reiko

Otro espíritu maligno japonés que vive en los servicios es Kashima Reiko. Tras haberse convertido en un espíritu maligno después de haber sufrido una muerte trágica, este espíritu de sexo femenino acecha en los baños de colegios y hogares en busca de sus piernas. 

Cuando se la oye preguntar dónde están sus piernas, el individuo debe responder “en la autopista de Meishin”. El espíritu le preguntará entonces al usuario del lavabo dónde consiguió esa información, a lo que se le debe contestar: “Kashima Reiko me lo contó.” Pero el espíritu aún se guarda una pregunta con trampa en la recámara. Cuando pregunta cuál es su nombre, se le debe responder que es “el Demonio de la Máscara de la Muerte.”

Kashima Reiko. (Imagen original)

Akaname: mantengan limpios sus lavabos

El demonio Akaname tiene un aspecto terrorífico y su saliva es venenosa. Sin embargo, al sentirse atraído por la suciedad, su función es lamer la inmundicia hasta dejar los lavabos bien limpios. Es el menos peligroso de todos los dioses y demonios de los lavabos, y se cree que en un principio tuvo su origen como táctica para atemorizar a los niños y convencerles de que tuvieran limpios sus lavabos.

Dibujo de un ‘akaname’. Primer volumen del Gazu Hyakki Yakō de Toriyama Sekien (siglo XVIII). (Public Domain)

Belfegor el perezoso

En la mitología judeocristiana, se describe a Belfegor como un demonio con barba, uñas afiladas y una boca siempre abierta, sentado en un trono que es también un retrete. Los rabinos creían que este demonio solo podía ser invocado sentándose en el lavabo u ofreciéndole los propios excrementos. Se cree que esta entidad demoníaca es perezosa: se pasa todo el día sentado en el retrete y comiendo excrementos humanos.

Ilustración de Belfegor, ‘Dictionnaire Infernal’. (Public Domain)

Silencio para Sulak

El demonio babilónico Sulak también acechaba en los lavabos. Al encontrarse el usuario solo y sentado en el retrete, en ese momento era vulnerable y ofrecía al demonio la ocasión perfecta para atacar. En este caso, lo haría provocando alguna enfermedad, considerada de este modo como “la mano de Sulak.” Si aquellos que utilizaban el lavabo no se comportaban con modestia y permanecían en silencio, el demonio supuestamente se sentiría ofendido y golpearía.

Más demonios de los lavabos

En la mitología china, Zi-Gu es la diosa de los lavabos. Cuando se la venera como es debido, se encarga de mantener el retrete limpio y desinfectado. En la antigua Roma, Cloacina era la diosa de las cloacas, Stercutius el dios de los excrementos y Crepitus era invocado para curar el estreñimiento o la diarrea.

Imagen de portada: Terror en el lavabo. (Imagen original)

Autor: Valda Roric

Este artículo fue publicado originalmente en www.ancient-origins.net y ha sido traducido con permiso.

Fuentes:

Valda Roric – “From History to Mystery”

Michael Ashkenazi – “Handbook of Japanese Mythology”

Michæl Dylan Foster y Shinonome Kijin – “The Book of Yokai: Mysterious Creatures of Japanese Folklore”

18 JUNIO, 2016 - 22:55 ANCIENT-ORIGINS

https://www.ancient-origins.es/noticias-general-mitos-leyendas-europa-asia/leyendas-urbanas-antiguos-mitos-esp%C3%ADritus-seres-terror%C3%ADficos-que-acechan-el-lavabo-003533

La Ingenieria Social: Otro Proyecto de Control Mental delas Masaspor los mismos Eugenesicos”

Elon Musk: Podemos extinguirnos en cualquier momento, por lo que hay que acelerar el viaje interplanetario

Y si no es en cualquier momento del futuro próximo, lo será en poco más de 5.000 millones de años, cuando el Sol se expanda y engulla a la Tierra. Muchos se preguntan qué necesidad hay de gastar tanto dinero en misiones espaciales y en conquistar otros mundos, si no podemos lidiar con los problemas en nuestro propio planeta. 

Elon Musk piensa que no tenemos nada por seguro, y que dado que extinciones masivas han ocurrido antes por causas como impactos de meteoritos o explosión de supervolcanes, es menester salir de la Tierra y tener un respaldo para nuestra especie. 

Así lo ha manifestado el CEO de SpaceX en una reciente entrevista que le realizaron en el podcast Sway, de Kara Swisher. «Pienso que esto es fundamental para asegurar la supervivencia a largo término de la vida y convertirnos en una especie multiplanetaria. 

No intento ser agorero o pesimista aquí, pero los registros fósiles nos muestran que ha habido muchas extinciones a través de los milenios. 

A causa de meteoros, supervolcanes y variaciones climáticas naturales, lo cuál sería algo muy severo pero a un ritmo que podría parecer lento para nosotros. 

Y luego, eventualmente, el Sol se expandirá, engullirá y, técnicamente, incinerará a la Tierra», opinó —aclarando la obviedad que lo último no ocurrirá pronto—. 

En el pasado, Musk afirmó que SpaceX debería producir al menos mil cohetes Starship durante un período de nueve años para llevar un millón de personas a Marte. 

El magnate es uno de los principales promotores de la colonización de Marte, pero no es el único con pretensiones interplanetarias. Por ejemplo, Jeff Bezos, el hombre más rico del mundo, quiere hacer lo propio en la Luna con su compañía aeroespacial Blue Origin, colonizándola y llevando industrias allí. «Bueno, es mejor un duopolio que un monopolio, y un oligopolio es mejor que un duopolio. 

Lo que más quieres, esencialmente, es varias compañías compitiendo para servir a un bien mayor o al cliente. Quieres múltiples compañías compitiendo para avanzar en el futuro del vuelo espacial», reconoció Musk. Arco de las civilizaciones En la misma entrevista, Musk también señaló que, a pesar de su esfuerzo y el de otros, aún nos falta un largo trecho. «Tenemos un extenso camino por recorrer. Porque ni siquiera hemos sido capaces de regresar de nuevo a la Luna. 

Es bastante triste que en 1969 hayamos sido capaces de ir a la Luna y hoy, en 2020, no hemos vuelto. Definitivamente pretendemos que nuestra civilización mejore con el tiempo, aunque hay que notar que siempre existe un arco. 

No siempre se avanza. Solo basta con ver a los antiguos egipcios, sumerios, babilonios, y la ancestral Grecia, todas tuvieron un arco civilizacional. Tuvieron una increíble tecnología y luego perdieron la habilidad de usarla». 

Musk concluye las respuestas a este tema afirmando que sus cohetes reutilizables son la clave para la conquista espacial y así volver a subir en el arco de nuestra civilización. Para ver la entrevista completa y su transcripción, visita este enlace. 

Fuente: New York Times. Edición: MP.

https://mysteryplanet.com.ar/site/elon-musk-podemos-extinguirnos-en-cualquier-momento-por-lo-que-hay-que-acelerar-el-viaje-interplanetario/

No los ves, pero están ahí